WebBritish railways v Herrington 1972. Duty of Care. Section 1(3) OLA 1984= occupier owes a duty of care to unlawful visitors if they are aware of the danger, they know or ought to … WebAs in British Railways Board v Herrington [1972]. Most obviously trespassers, but also includes ramblers by virtue of s 1(4) of the OLA 1957. Defi ned negatively—‘non-visitors’. As with the 1957 Act,˜the risk of injury must be due to the state of the premises rather than as a result˜of an activity on them (Revill v Newberry [1996]).

Law Unit One - Dowell Flashcards Quizlet

WebBritish Railways Board v Herrington [1972] AC 877 House of Lords A six year old boy was electrocuted and suffered severe burns when he wondered from a play park onto a live … WebMar 9, 2024 · British Railways v Herrington 1972 In-text: (British Railways v Herrington, [1972]) Your Bibliography: British Railways v Herrington [1972] HL. Court case C (a minor) v DPP 1995 In-text: (C (a minor) v DPP, [1995]) Your Bibliography: C (a minor) v DPP [1995] HL. Court case Davis v Johnson 1979 In-text: (Davis v Johnson, [1979]) myse saint elizabeth login

Occupiers

WebJan 25, 2015 · In British Railways Board v Herrington [1972] AC 877, 930-931, Lord Diplock, dealing with the liability of a railway undertaking for injury suffered by … Webwhat happened in the British Rail V Herrington (1972) case? -child burned and electrocuted after trespassing on railway line -access was through a damaged fence that British Rail knew about but did not fix -there was nothing in … WebHerrington v British Railways Board [1972] AC 877 Issue. The House of Lords overruled (modified) Addie v Dumbreck [1929] AC 358. In Addie, the House of Lords had held that … the spa fitness